Ryan, a short film directed by Chris Landreth, is about the Canadian animator Ryan Larkin. Larkin is known for his shorts "Walking" and "Street Musique". Chris Landreth introduces himself to us in a funky restroom and then introduces the film's subject, Ryan Larkin, a brilliant animator in the 1960s and early 1970s. Chris shows clips of "Walking" and "Street Musique," Ryan's ground-breaking shorts. We now see Ryan as he is: emaciated, alcoholic, much of his mind gone; we meet Felicity Fanjoy, his love during his creative period, and Derek Lamb, his producer. Ryan talks to Chris in the dining hall of what is probably a homeless shelter or soup kitchen. Chris tries an intervention. We follow Ryan out into the street where he panhandles. The animation, which uses live footage, reveals the ravaged burned-out graceful man
Ryan was conceived, developed and animated in the world of 3D computer generated imagery (CGI). Although the characters and sets have detailed realism, everything in the film has been modelled with CGI tools- there is no live-action footage. All characters in Ryan were animated by hand (there was no 'motion capture' used in the film). A number of software tools were used to create interesting 'effects,' such as smoke, fog, distortions, clothing and dynamic hair on the characters. The production of Ryan relied heavily on Alias's Maya animation software (V 4.0) for modelling, rigging, animation, lighting and rendering of the 3D world in the film. In addition, we used Discreet Combustion V2.1 for all compositing and 2D effects, Adobe Photoshop V7.0 for painting and texturing, and Adobe Premiere for creative development and editing.
Chris Landreth (1961 - ) Biography from a retired page on the dmc3d.com web site; photo (2005) from the IMDb
The movie starts out in what appears to be an abandoned machine factory. The lights are flickering and the factories machines are trying to turn on. As the lights turn on the setting is changed to a battlefield where two opposing sides start battling over an unknown objective. As both sides are taking heavy losses, the machines start to lose power and the remaining soldiers flee for safety as the machines and battlefield go quiet once more. The movie ends as the machines start to power up again, hinting at a never-ending cycle.
I believe the theme of the short movie is of humanities struggle with itself. The world, in which the movie portrays, appears to be a post-apocalyptic setting in that humanities self-destructive nature has destroyed civilization as they know it, and even on the brink of extinction they still wage war on each other. The machines signaling of the start and end of the battle may be a metaphor that describes modern society’s need for technology, which is both damaging and live-saving.
http://www.platige.com/index.php?lng=en
http://www.pazera.pl/site/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mD_ly40k6X0
“Azureus Rising”
Short Film
Director: David Weinstein
The short film follows an individulal wearing a high-tech suit that gives him incredible speed and agility. The movie is full of action, guns, and swordplay. The character fights several foes at once, evades a helicopter's attacks, and defeats a huge mechanized scorpion. The best five minute action movie ever.
I can't think of any kind of theme, hidden meaning, or metaphors that this film explores, other than just pure action.
"Azureus Rising" took David Weinstein two years with a team of five people to finish. The entire film is keyframed, the animation was created completely by hand, without the use of motion capture or rotoscoping. It was originally a concept for a video game and feature film.
"AZUREUS RISING" Black sun entertainment (http://thesunsetsblack.com/)
No Dialog, and it can still tell two great stories. The making of it, and the short action packed sequence. This proof of concept took two years of San Diego director/producer David Weinstein’s time and money to create it. All with the hope of it being turned into a feature film, and video game franchise. David had to work freelance jobs to fund the production, while still trying to meet the challenge of creating five and half minutes of feature quality, high definition animation . Some of the struggles included were, the animation was all keyframed there is no motion capture or rotoscoping used for any of the characters, with a core team of five artists, and no established pipeline or tech support team. Currently it is supposed to be in the process of being turned into a feature film. and has won 8 awards. Best animated short film, Hollyshorts film festival, L.A. film festival, Malibu international film festival. The awards continue on with, best director, L.A. film festival, as well as, Best editing, best sound design, best original score, and best visuals, all from the L.A. international film festival. I actually was very surprised to see it was made by such a small group. The action was fantastic, the sound was beautiful, I loved that the only sound the main character made was his breathing through his mask. It had great weapons designs, and the perfect mix of Sci-fi, fantasy, and humanism. A great ride, I will see this if it becomes a feature film.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agk2svo7svI
BECKS "FOUR STEPS" Directed by Dougal Wilson, animation and compositing by Passion Pictures. (http://www.passion-pictures.com/flash.html)
It is a pretty simple and very cool, little beer commercial. It starts out really simple, a marionette dancing this little four step routine, on a dim kind of slum like street corner. (the dance is one way they pointed to Beck’s beer, and its four ingredients, (barley, water, hops, and yeast) Then out of the blue a 2d cartoon that looks like the marionette pops out of the sewer and dances along. Then a stop motion resembling the other two jumps over the fence, and the 3 of them do the 4 step dance. Lastly a guy who the other 3 have been modeled after joins in. there are some really cool little things, like a dog that makes the live action guy jump, and he bumps into the stop motion guy. And they all react really well. It’s a great way they have combined these different styles. 42 seconds, and the same 4 step dance, one of the coolest 42 seconds I’ve spent online though.
The name of the short film is Descendants. It was created by Helko van der Scherm who was in charge of the script and Holger Schoenberger who was responsible for all the technical aspects. Scherm started working on the initial script in 2005 and it took a total of 3 years to get to the finished product.
A quick summary of Descendants is that the film is about two flowers growing at the edge of a field. One is older and has a bleak outlook on life, while the other is young and full of hope still. The whole message of the short is that something good can come out of something bad. The entire film is rendered in 3D. The flowers themselves have quite a bit of detail, and even have faces placed toward the base of the flower petals, near where the petals meet the stem. Although it is only 14 minutes long, each flower shows a distinctive personality, and for some flowers like the older red one, a history that is never told.
The making of Descendants A website where you can find information about the making of the film, including how the characters went from hand drawn 2D characters to 3D characters while retaining the same “feel” the hand drawn versions portray.
Talking about the Script Helko van der Scherm talks about the script for Descendants and some of the meaning behind some of the actions characters take, and explaining how some things happened.
For the 3D modeling, they used XSI 5.11. Scherm says that they had to “translate” each 2D drawing they did into 3D, but not by scanning, but by recreating the image 3D to get the same feel the 2D version had. So really, they created the characters and scenes twice in some cases.
I think Scherm was trying to get at the idea that “Descendants” can mean a lot of things, and descendants can be obtained by both good and bad things. Even though both flowers and the deer died, the deer enabled the seeds of the white flower to grow and produce a whole new family of flowers.
I really liked the film. It had a fairly simple message, but every time I watch it I catch something new; little things the characters say or do. It stood out to me originally because Woopi Goldberg voiced one of the flowers, but as I watched it I felt like it stood out because it made you wonder about the characters. You wondered what happened to the red flower that made her so bitter until you find out why. Then you wonder what the motive of the red flower is to “help” the white flower attract the deer. It keeps you wondering until the very end, and even then the end lets you reflect on what happened and explore why.
Recently we were given an assignment to check out a STASH video and pick a short film to feature in this blog. One of the criteria was to research the artist and/or production company. This is where first impressions went out the window for me. I love music, and gravitate towards artists that, not only put on a great stage show, but who have a well-developed body of work (no one-hit wonders).
The first video I considered was the AIDES “Grafitti”.
I loved the combination of Illustration over live action background footage. The piece was hugely funny and entertaining, but, when I researched the company, TBWA, France, I was less than impressed with their other efforts. Granted, they had some interesting concepts. The pieces for the Grammy awards, done in collage of u-tube style amateur videos of fans aping their favorite singers was a novel concept, but (as David Bowie once said), the Grammy’s are a testament to mediocrity, not artistic greatness. I did like the concept of portraying political prisoners behind a wrought iron fence in France, (done for amnesty international, long-time cause of Peter Gabriel,et al), but all in all their work left me empty and void, so I moved on.
The next piece I considered was a short for the BBC on the winter olympics that I loved.
The illustrations are phenomenal, but, when I investigated Red Bee media I could not find much that grabbed my attention. There was an interesting piece done for TV, but nothing absolutely spectacular, certainly nothing else drawn, which is my main focus (another dead end).
The third subject I looked at I initially ignored because I had already presented the video to the class (a requirement of the assignment). It was a short piece developed by royale studios utilizing work done byAdam Haynes. It is amazing, and I liked what I found out about both companies.
Adam Haynes is our personalhero. Seriously have you seen his work? Not only is it CRAZY detailed and dynamic, but it’s begging to be moved. Luckily, our friends at FUEL TV provided us the opportunityto collaborate with Adam through their signature series. Adam threw down some key frames, including an insanely detailed wave that we then had the pleasure of animating.
Below is an excerpt from an interview by adam found at:
Biography I was born and raised in rural Central Oregon and gained a deep respect for the outdoors at an early age. Painting and drawing were always a passion, and I decided to pursue my interests in art and nature by attending school in Bozeman, Montana. After graduation, the city beckoned, and I moved to Portland to pursue a graphic design career designing tee shirts and apparel for adidas. After a few years of computer design I began to draw and paint with more frequency, and soon began putting together an occasional show. My interests continued to move in a hand drawn direction as I strayed from computer illustration more and more. After four years, my wife and I decided to move back to Bend, Oregon to pursue a more active lifestyle and a freelance career in illustration. Two years later my client list is growing continually, the work keeps coming, and I still manage to put together an occasional show.
If you like to see more of his work check out the following sites.
As for royale, I was hugely impressed to find out that they were chosen to do promotion for the David Bowie inspired redo of the recently opened Lofts At Cherokee Studios.
We had the honor of collaborating with RC Design Federation in creating the video components for the David Bowie-inspired multi-media installation for Rock 'n' Platinum: A Designer Showcase That Interprets Music Through Design. The showcase was commissioned to introduce Lofts @ Cherokee Studios. The development pays homage to the loft's historic namesake and grounds where musical lumiaries like Bowie, Sinatra, Stevie Wonder, and Johnny Cash once laid down indelible recordings. We produced two video installations - one for each level - to enhance the experiential cohesion of the "Bowie" motif. On the top level, a mesmerizing portrait of Bowie, which slowly morphs into abstractions of his various creative personas. On the lower level (as part of the more intimate Bowie "suite"), a looping four-minute montage splicing motion graphics with Bowie film clips, set to Jen's favorite rock anthem "I'm Afraid of Americans".
Station To Station was originally recorded at Cherokee Recording Studios in Hollywood. The facility was just opened in 1975, and David was the first major British act to record there. I didn’t choose Cherokee because it was “the” state of the art facility in L.A., it certainly was not, but rather because it was unknown at the time. My thinking was that its anonymity would help keep us below the radar with the press, groupies and paparazzi.
We recorded in Studio 1 which was the first ever Tom Hidley-designed room and later redesigned by George Augspurger. Near-field monitors were JBL 4311s. The recording console was a Trident A Range. There were only 13 of these boards ever made and Cherokee eventually went on to own four of them. This console probably has one of the best sounding mic/line/EQ combinations to this day. David was the first artist to use the Trident A Range in “Studio 1” which helped to establish Cherokee as a world class facility.
We recorded on MCI JH-24, 24 track analogue tape machines and utilized much of what is now considered “vintage” equipment; Eventide (delays and harmonizers), EMT Echo Plates, UA/Urie and Teletronix compressors, API EQs, and DBX noise gates and compressors. Microphones were the standard array of Neumann, Shure, AKG, Sennheiser, and EVs. We also used the Dolby-A noise reduction system.
The project was mixed at The Hit Factory in New York which was my home studio and wherein I was chief recording engineer. We had a custom built console utilizing the now classic API 550 equalizers in each channel module. It had no automation, so like all mixing in those days, the mix was somewhat of a performance in itself. Every pass had small differences and sometimes it came to editing different takes together to achieve the “final” mix. TVC15 is a classic example of this. The 24 tape tracks were packed with different instrument information ending up on the same track at times. This of course made it impossible to add EQ and dynamics processing to a track for a continuous mix pass. One cannot affect a piano, saxophone and maracas in the same manner; hence the song was mixed in sections. My assistant added a second pair of hands for the most demanding sections. The multi-track machine was an Ampex MM-1000… a beast of a machine, but very reliable and the 2-trk machine was an Ampex AG-440. The outboard possessing equipment was very similar to what Cherokee had in L.A.
The Nassau concert utilized the famous Record Plant remote truck. I can’t really remember much about the equipment other than it had Ampex 24 Track analogue tape machines… probably MM-1100s. I used it several times when recording for King Biscuit, but I never concerned myself too much with the equipment. The most important thing to me in a remote live situation is having good knowledgeable assistants who know the meaning of urgency and getting the concert recorded. The monitor mix in the truck may not be perfect, but as long as the information is recorded, I know I can get it to sound good when taken back to the studio.
The new Nassau mixes were mixed at Sweetersongs East Studios in Santa Monica, California (Michele Vice-Maslin, owner) utilizing direct transfers from the original multi-track analogue tapes to ProTools HD 24/96 and a vast array of “top of the line” Plug-Ins. An Avid Control-24 board was used as the interface to the dual quad core Mac Pro. Speakers are Yamaha self powered near field monitors.
The 5.1 Station To Station was mixed at The Barn in Agoura Hills California. This was also in the Pro Tools HD 24/96 format utilizing an Avid Icon interface. Westlake monitors were used in the array. Again a vast selection of Plug- Ins from many top line suppliers was used.
When it came time to “Master” the two projects, the first engineer of choice that came to mind was Brian Gardner who had mastered the original Station To Station back in the ‘70s. At the time Brian worked for Allen Zentz Mastering in Hollywood. In those days we were still using Neumann disk cutting lathes and once all of the audio decisions were made for each song involving EQ and compression one could expect to receive a test lacquer shortly thereafter that had been cut directly on the lathe by the Mastering Engineer. Of course, everything used in the mastering chain was analogue including the half inch tape on which the project was mixed.
Brian now works at the famous Bernie Grundman Mastering Studios in Hollywood. Visiting Brian today for a mastering session involves carrying your hard drive tucked under your arm. The drive for these sessions contained an enormous amount of digital information. Between the Nassau concert, the 5.1 Station To Station mixes and the stereo fold down mixes (all having been mixed in Pro Tools, High Definition) there were quite a few gigabytes resting comfortably on the drive. Brian and I played through each track numerous times tweaking the EQ and dynamics. The digital information came out of the computer on their high end D/A converters and from there routed to the console for processing. All of the equipment in the audio chain at Grundman’s is still analogue, including the consoles. No computer plug-ins were used in mastering.
Finally, I think an important thing to know about both projects is that there is no Auto-Tune used on any mix. All of David’s vocals remain as they were originally recorded.
Harry Maslin Co-producer of the original album and new mixes.
The live Nassau coliseum concert has long been one of my favorite bootlegs. Unknown guitarist Stacey Heydon was discovered by David playing in a bar in Canada. He has a knack for driving the rhythm of established songs beyond their normal pace and cadence (check out his work with Iggy pop on the 1977 tour where he was offered as a last minute replacement after Bowie departed with guitarist Ricky Gardner to record Low in France). Previously, only three tracks from this show were “officially” released…Word on a wing and Stay (with an extended solo not available on the boot), and Queen bitch, released on an obscure title by David’s former management, MAINMAN. Lou Reed’s Waiting for the man has been noticeably absent until now. It is a high-energy “must have IMO.
And, for those of you in the market for the hippest studio on the planet, here is wikipedia’s take.
Lofts At Cherokee Studios is a mixed-use development featuring 12 live/work lofts and 3 commercial condominiums. Formerly a recording studio doing business as Cherokee Studios, the site is the recording home to over 300 gold and platinum records as well as numerous film soundtracks. The site is also the former home of MGM Recording Studio. On August 31, 2007, Cherokee Studios shuttered to transform into its newest incarnation: the first LEED Platinum certified mixed-use development.
The Cherokee Studios has a rich history due, in part, to its facilities. The complex had three separate studios plus common facilities. Both Studio 1 and Studio 3 had vintage hand-made Trident A-Range Consoles made in the early '70s, while the other studio was used by vocal coach Roger Love "vocal coach to the stars". In addition to current technology, the studio claims to have one of the largest collections of vintage tube microphones in the industry. The complex was owned by the Robb brothers, Bruce, Dee and Joe, who bought them in 1975 from Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.
According to Billboard.biz, Cherokee closed its doors on Aug 31, 2007. LA's Cherokee Studios To Close[1]
The new lofts, a collaboration between the Robb brothers and developer REthink Development, will be designed for both LEED certification and private, home recording capability.
Lofts at Cherokee Studios are scheduled to open in Summer 2009.
Cherokee's founders, the Robb Brothers alongside famed acoustician '"George Augspurger"', Lawrence Scarpa '"Pugh + Scarpa Architects"' and '"REthink Development"' designed live/work lofts in the spirit of Cherokee (recording) Studios' Studio 1. The enhanced sound control measures and unit layouts are designed for private, home living, recording and production. The two, premium units feature dedicated music production control, isolation, and tracking space already built to professional home studio specifications. Other units can quickly be adapted for music production.
The new lofts consists of 12 condominium live/work lofts and 2,800 square feet (260 m2) of retail space. The building is 5 stories, including 1 underground level of parking, first floor retail and parking, 3 floors of lofts on floors 2 though 4 as well as a rooftop deck and green roof.
The lofts range in size from 1,200 to 2,400 square feet (220 m2). Each loft has a unique floor plan. Seven of the lofts are two-story town homes perched 30 to 50 feet (15 m) above street level. Home music production or creative space will be on the 4th floor 40 feet (12 m) above street level to maximize city skyline views, daylight and energy efficiency.
Three of the lofts are tri-level with 15-foot (4.6 m) high ceilings in the living space with mezzanines and an intermediate level that opens to the landscaped courtyard. Finally, two lofts flats have 11-foot (3.4 m) high ceilings also opening to the landscaped courtyard. All lofts have 2 to 3 bathrooms and 1 to 4 bedrooms.
These lofts' live/work spaces negate the need to commute to and from work. The design of the live/work spaces, therefore, mitigates impacts upon energy and economic resources. Furthermore, environmental impacts decrease due to the dual function of building and energy resources for home and work. As a result, residents save money on utilities by conserving energy resources.
Private, Home Recording Spaces
The individual recording spaces are designed for artists and professionals in the creative industries. Musicians, composers, producers as well as film and television animators, directors and editors can fulfill their work duties in these studios. The recording space was designed by leading acoustician George Augspurger with Cherokee Studios founder and multi-platinum producer-engineer Bruce Robb.
Green Building
Cherokee Studios is the first mixed-use building designed for LEED Platinum certification. The U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (or, LEED) is the world's premier and most rigorous green building rating system. LEED rates buildings on their ability to reduce impacts from energy, materials, water and transportation while improving the health of the indoor and urban environments. Platinum is the highest certification level achievable.
Cherokee Studios was one of the most significant Hollywood recording studios with over 300 Platinum and Gold albums recorded by artists such as Ella Fitzgerald, David Bowie, Elton John, Frank Sinatra, and Elvis.
“It was unbelievable,” says Bruce Robb of Cherokee, “You could wake up at 3 in the morning, go into Cherokee and it was like the biggest, most exciting nightclub in town. It was around the clock, with the most insane things going on in the rooms. We'd have Barry Manilow in one room, Kiss in another room and Frank Sinatra in another room. And Bob Crewe was just crankin' with disco. There were two sessions a day in each room; one would stop at 8 p.m., the next would start at 9 and go to the next morning. At one point, Joe and I were doing Sinatra, and Dee was doing [David] Bowie. Bowie would stroll into our session and invite Sinatra back into his session. We'd have Jeff Beck in doing Wired, and he'd go up to a Rod Stewart session — ‘Lemme play a solo on this track.’ There was a lot of that then; nowadays, it's a little more closed off, more driven toward the market and the brand of the group. It was more about music than marketing back then, and the artists were still leading the trends. We catered to the artist rather than the label, because those are the guys who made the records. And you know what? That's still the way we feel.”
The legacy is Elton John feeling the vibe and sitting at the piano in Studio One to write music. It is Elvis, Sinatra, Fitzgerald. It is Bob Seger recording Hollywood Nights with two different drum sets. It is warm summer nights on the roof of Cherokee Studios with the Robbs at the “Shanghai Bar and Grill”. It is Belushi living in the studio and sleeping on the floor. The legacy is the collection of stories, experiences, and creativity that make the soul of this place worth preserving.
History
In his autobiography, The Beatles producer George Martin called Cherokee Studios the best studio in America.
Cherokee Studios moved to 751 N. Fairfax in 1975 after purchasing the building from MGM Records. Originally built as Frank Sinatra’s string room, Studio One quickly became one of the most sought after large tracking rooms in existence. This special space in combination with Cherokee founder’s vision to create a recording studio built by recording artists for recording artists resulted in an atmosphere that was not replicated anywhere. Artists referred to this atmosphere as “the Vibe”. Those craving a balance of the vibe and the technical and acoustic conditions to make great music, found Cherokee to be their favored destination.
Before moving to the famous site on Fairfax, Cherokee Studios was founded by the Robb brothers in a converted barn on a ranch in Chatsworth. The brothers, successful 60’s folk rock musicians known as The Robbs, had set up the ranch as their rehearsal space. As word got out about their set up, it quickly became the place for recording artists to escape the stuffy corporate labels in favor of an environment that cultivated creativity. Now as producers and engineers, the powerful combination of the Robb brother’s commitment to the artist attracted top talent. Little Richard, Del Shannon, and Rick Nelson were soon clients and Bob Crewe produced the first Disco record at the studio. Before Cherokee was ready to take over Studio One on Fairfax, they had already cut Steely Dan’s Pretzel Logic that went gold.
The studio soon outgrew its location and in 1975 they purchased Studio One from MGM. “The vibe” created by the Robb’s enthusiasm for the creative process and the acoustics designed by world famous acoustician, George Augspurger, ensured that the success continued. Overall, Cherokee Studios produced over 300 gold and platinum albums on site and an untold number of amazing stories and experiences. We expect they won’t be the last.
The Legacy in Design
Dynamic Façade. The dynamic façade emulates the inherent dynamic nature of the music created at Cherokee Studios by being in a constant state of change. The morphing skin of the building is an outward manifestation of the creativity of its residents.
Studio One’s Black Forest Wood. Materials from the recording studio are reused throughout the new building including the dark wood paneling from Germany’s Black Forest that completed Frank Sinatra’s Studio One.
History. The building entrance, signage, walkway and doors reflect the past of Cherokee Studios. Gold and platinum records, memorabilia, and reminders of the artists that recorded at Cherokee are integrated in the lobby design.
Dedicated Music Production Studio Suites. In the new Cherokee Studios the premium and music units will include home recording or editing studios designed masterfully by Cherokee Studio’s founders for music or film making.
Great artists attract great artists and projects. This is why Adam Haynes and royale studios spot for FUEL tv tops my list of great short films. Hope you found this blog informative, as well as entertaining. See you in cyberspace.
In this short film it shows a young boy by the name of ragu who wishes to become a monky. his mentor send him on a mission to retrieve this glowing gold ball at the top of a tree. from wat i know about monks and other forms of religious pasages is that they have to pass some kind of epic road to ritiousness. and this boy has to grab this ball and bring it back to his master to prove he is worthy of becoming a monk. as he find his way up the tree, a monkey grabs the ball and runs away. having the boy chase him around up a mountain where the monkey falls off the edge and the boy is trying to save both the glowing ball and the monkey. but he can only save one. and he drops the ball so he can help save the monkey. when he gets back to his master he is sad thinking he failed the mission. but the monkey was a test from the master it self. so the child earned his passage to become a monk. what i think the filmmaker is trying to show is that there are obsticles you have to go thru in life to become a more ritious person. and its not about the material objects, its about life. and helping otheres.
So in this short film a man is getting into his car that is in a tight spot. and he has to keep goin back and forth in his small spot to try and get out. it kind of reminds me of the austin powers movie when he is in the hall in dr. evils secret lab and he is in the that vehicle and cant turn it around and keeps going in drive and reverse and drive and reverse. its really funny becuase its animated to make it more comical. and right at the end when this person finally gets his car out of the spot. a huge massive peice of meat drops right on top of his car and ends the film. when i first started watching this i thought it was funny that the car barelly had any room to move. so seeing how he would get out of it would be funny. and i didnt expect the huge meat to drop on his and end the film right there.i dont know wat the filmmaker is trying to say with this besides its just odd and funny.
The "West Bank Story" is a spoof and a take- off of the Broadway hit, "Westside Story"; which is, itself, a musical version of Romeo and Juliet.
In the place of Sharks and Jets, we find singing and dancing Palestinians and Jews in competition for the fast food industry in their shared town. Imagine this… the KosherKing (like BurgerKing) side by side with the Hummus Hut. The opening scenes are eerily similar to the movie version of Arthur Laurents’ original script of Westside Story; complete with Jerome Robbins’ choreography, but the “gangs” are comic relief. The Jews and the Palestinians fight with snapping fingers and rapid dance steps and somehow my mind had trouble believing what I was seeing.
I don’t know what I expected, but it wasn’t what I got. I laughed until I cried. The 1957 musical was nominated for a Tony, and the 2006 West Bank was a short which won an Academy Award for “Live Action”. The musical parts are really what I liked best and were so well done that I feel these must have had a lot of influence in the nominations… I guess that’s the live action, right? Then again the dialog was very funny and corny, too.
While the older brothers are arguing over territory, Fatima, the Humus Hut counter girl and David, the young Israeli soldier… are falling in love. As the lovers search for a way to be together, the Jewish brother begins building a wall between the two businesses to hide his competitor’s sign. The Palestinian brother responds by preparing Molotov cocktails to blow the wall apart. In the end, though the lovers try to make peace between their families, their pleas do not succeed. The hatred is too strong.
Then, in the midst of chaos… a miracle! The older brothers are drawn together by commerce… money talks and people are hungry for their breakfasts. Falafel brings world peace as the Jews and Arabs line up together for breakfast. Hooray!
Oh, and the young lovers share a kiss, at the end.
I picked this because the thumb nail intrigued me. The thumb nail picture looked like white soldiers with there guns aimed and ready to fire. Once I hit play I realized that all the figurines were made out of wax. This is a very short film/Commercial a minute long about Put to death the death penalty.
When I first watched it, It looks like real wax figurines which included soldiers on a firing line, someone about to be beheaded, A hanging, and then the electric chair. In the center was a candle with barbwire wrapped around it (the flame). The morel of the story is that the firing squad started to melt, and then the beheaded and so on. At the end their ad campaign came up which again was created using melted wax or the illusion of it. The most interesting part is how well they looked hand crafted and the beauty each held as they were melting into nothing, it did bring the feeling of peace watching them all melt. The choice of music flowed perfectly in sync with the video. Even if you don't agree with the message you will find yourself watching it over and over again to see all the little details that you may have missed the first time.
The creator of this video at first thought he would be-able to pull this off using a still camera and real figurines but that didn't work so well. so he went home and shot himself burning flames and and dripping cream every where to get the melted wax effect. The program they were using did water well but not melting wax. It was said to be a challenge to the end.
This was an in house competition for Blur employees to come up with a short film. This particular film was even nominated for an Oscar . It took 5 months in production with a team of 25. On the Blur website you may only view gallery images of the video and they have a link to I Tunes where you may purchase the short clip for $1.99.
This film had great graphics and detail within in each piece. It had the real effects of dust and movement through out the video. To me the colors could have been a little more vibrant. At some points it was hard to distinguish between things. Which could have been because the background sun shine was so strong. The characters were great and I loved how real the frustration level was.
I picked this film because the characters looked well put together and looked like it would be a well craft production. I also assumed that this would be cute or funny to watch and I believed it would entertain me. This short film did exactly what I believed it would do for me. Made me laugh and smile and ask wow how did they do this and I bet it took a long time.
The filmmaker is try to portray that things in life are not free and even the best of plans can go terribly wrong. I think in this case the Gopher might have learned his lesson.
This film is about a very hungry and smart gopher who is plotting on how to steal food from the farmers. He is on a dirt road between crops of corn standing next to a tomato sign. He watches as the farmers drive by in their trucks loaded full of veggies. This is when he decides to burrow-holes around in the ground. By doing this he made a huge pothole for the trucks to hit. His intentions were to have the truck drop some of those delicious vegetables out of the back of the truck. His plan worked over and over again but the poor gopher was getting so frustrated because every-time the veggies fell out of the trucks another rodent, chickens, or crows came and stole it before he had a chance to get to them. He got so angry that he slammed and stomped and destroyed the tomato sign that he didn't notice the next truck coming. The truck swerved and and out fell a steer and landed right on the gopher. The end result is the tire was fixed and the steer was loaded back up with the gopher stuck to his butt and the steer was smacking him in the face with his tail.
I chose two films that are about guys who want the girl. The first film is a wonderful little story called”Gary”. This film is about a young boy who is in love with the older girl. The other film is a funny short called “The Gentleman’s Duel”. This is a story of two men who fight for the love of a woman. However, these films are polar opposites when it comes to style.
“Gary” is a rough gritty low budget French student film by 4 people. It has a great stylistic look to the film that sends you on a journey into the mind of a 10 year old boy. This film is in French but they do a great job of getting you to feel those goofy day dream visions of a child who wants to be the hero and win the girl no matter how ridiculous the scenario or whatever the language.
The other film is a highly polished film by Blur Studios done buy a team of nearly 80. Blur studios is a big player in the animation world. This film is near Pixar quality in animation and in story. They create a simple world of two gentlemen trying to court a rich beautiful woman. Then the story spins into a fantastically hilarious world of where the gentleman dueling with giant steam driven robotic battle suits.
These two films have a lot in common. They each tell a simple story of guys wanting a woman and willing to fight for her love. They each invoke emotions that we can relate to no matter what fantastic element is happening. Fighting for another’s affection is at the heart of what it is to be a man. An overcoming all odds to make it happen is what makes a good story that we all can relate to. I would invite you to take the time to watch the simple home pc feel of “Gary” and the Pixaresque vision of Blur studios “The Gentleman’s Duel”. Each short is enjoyable and worth your time to watch.
